RECOMMENDATION STUDIES

AI Recommendation Study Design

This study design separates incidental mentions from shortlist inclusion and explicit recommendation. It also records the use-case conditions and caveats attached to each brand.

Enterprise team reviewing an AI visibility benchmark and evidence-led research

RECOMMENDATION STUDIES

Answer Coding Framework

Absent

The entity does not appear in the captured answer.

Mentioned

The entity appears without recommendation language.

Considered

The entity is included among options for evaluation.

Recommended

The entity is explicitly suggested for the tested use case.

Caveated

A limitation, risk or conditional fit is attached.

Cited

A visible supporting source is linked or named.

RECOMMENDATION STUDIES

Stability And Repetition

Future studies will state the number of repetitions, session conditions, surface, model label, dates and geographic context. Volatile results will be reported as volatile; repeated outputs will not be collapsed into a false claim of deterministic rank.

RECOMMENDATION STUDIES

No Findings Yet

Evidence boundary

The coding framework is published. It does not establish which company is recommended, why a model behaved a certain way or how stable any market result may be.

Next Useful Step

Request An AI Visibility Diagnostic

Choose one company, one competitive set and one revenue-critical buyer journey. We will identify the decision questions, representation gaps and evidence requirements that matter most.